Natasha Pringle

In a recent battery life showdown, we put the new iPhone 15 lineup through its paces, comparing them to previous models to determine which one truly excels in endurance. Apple has made bold claims about the power efficiency of their latest devices, but how does this translate to real-world battery performance? ### The Competitors We tested the following iPhones: - **iPhone 15 Pro Max**: $1,199 - **iPhone 15 Pro**: $999 - **iphone overheats 15 Plus**: $899 - **iPhone 15**: $799 - **iPhone 14 Pro Max** - **iPhone 14** - **iPhone 13 Pro Max** The iPhone 13 Pro Max holds the current record on our battery test leaderboard, making it a crucial benchmark. ### Morning Routine and Early Results The test began with a typical morning routine involving breakfast and TikTok. Early on, the iPhone 15 Pro Max led the pack, closely followed by the reigning champion, the iPhone 13 Pro Max. This result was promising for the new model, but the smaller iPhone 15 Pro lagged behind. ### A Day of Tasks Throughout the day, iphone overheats we engaged in various activities including streaming music on Spotify, video conferencing, and using apps like ChatGPT-4. Despite Apple's claims about the efficiency of the A17 Pro chip in the iPhone 15 Pros, the 15 Pro struggled, hinting at a potential drawback: its smaller battery capacity compared to the base iPhone 15. ### Dynamic Island and Power Efficiency One theory for the 15 Pro's underperformance is its Dynamic Island feature, which may drain battery life. Additionally, while the A17 Pro chip boasts impressive power efficiency, it appears the gains are offset by increased performance demands. ### Camera Use and Efficiency Recording videos is another battery-intensive task. The 15 Pro Max continued to impress, surpassing the iPhone 14 Pro Max and even the 13 Pro Max. The base iPhone 15 also showed significant improvement over the 14, highlighting Apple's strides in making their base models more efficient. ### Gaming and Final Stretch Gaming typically drains battery quickly, yet the iPhone 15 Plus emerged as the unexpected leader. Its larger battery and efficient performance allowed it to outlast even the Pro Max models, despite being marketed as a mid-range option. ### The Results After an exhaustive day, here are the final battery life results: 1. **iPhone 15 Plus**: The undisputed champion with unprecedented battery life. 2. **iPhone 15 Pro Max**: The best performing Max model, but not quite the best overall. 3. **iPhone 13 Pro Max**: Still a powerhouse, just behind the latest Pro Max. 4. **iPhone 14 Pro Max**: Respectable endurance, though outshone by newer models. 5. **iPhone 15**: Surprisingly strong performance for a base model. 6. **iPhone 15 Pro**: Disappointing relative to its high-end positioning. 7. **iPhone 14**: The first to tap out, but still decent for regular users. ### Conclusion The iPhone 15 Plus, with its exceptional battery life, proves to be an outstanding choice for users prioritizing endurance. The iPhone 15 Pro Max offers a balanced mix of performance and battery life, making it ideal for power users. However, the smaller 15 Pro may not meet the expectations of those looking for both high performance and long battery life. Apple's advancements in battery technology and efficiency are evident, particularly in the base and Plus models. The introduction of the USB-C port, allowing for power sharing, adds a new dimension to how iPhones can be used throughout the day. If you value battery life above all, the iPhone 15 Plus is the clear winner. However, if you need top-tier performance and can manage slightly shorter battery life, the iPhone 15 Pro Max remains a solid choice.

I’ve never been much of an iPad person, but today, I’m hovering over the buy button for Apple’s latest iPad Pro, a device that costs an eye-watering $3,600 once fully specced out. Despite my initial skepticism about tablets, the new iPad Pro’s features and capabilities have me reconsidering my stance. ### The Allure of the New iPad Pro The 2024 iPad Pro lineup boasts a major make real money redesign. These tablets are astonishingly thin, with the 11-inch model measuring just 5.3 mm and the 13-inch model even slimmer at 5.1 mm. Holding one feels surreal, like wielding a full-fledged computer in an incredibly light package. The 13-inch model, for instance, weighs just 579 grams. For comparison, my black and white 10-inch writing tablet, which does little more than facilitate note-taking, weighs over 400 grams. The iPad Pro's thinness and lightness make real money it practical for on-the-go use without sacrificing performance. ### More Than Just a Tablet What truly sets the new iPad Pro apart is its potential to replace not just my writing tablet but also my laptop. The new M4 chip inside these iPads promises performance comparable to high-end laptops. This is the first time since 2013 that a tablet feels like it could replace multiple devices in my tech arsenal.  The accompanying accessories, like the new Pro Pencil and Magic Keyboard, enhance the iPad's versatility. The Magic Keyboard, though it looks like a standard folio case from the outside, transforms the iPad into a device that feels remarkably similar to a MacBook. The keyboard is solid, the trackpad is larger, and it even has a charging port and another USB port for added functionality. The second you snap the iPad into the case, it behaves just like a Mac, with all the swiping gestures and shortcuts instantly familiar to any Mac user. ### Enhancements and Innovations The new Pro Pencil has several upgrades, including a barrel roll feature and a squeeze function to bring up menus, making it more intuitive and efficient to use. A vibration motor adds tactile feedback, and you can now locate the pencil using the Find My app, which is a lifesaver for someone as forgetful as me. Under the hood, the iPad Pro's M4 chip offers significant performance improvements. While Apple’s performance metrics can be frustratingly vague, the leap from the previous M2 chip to the M4 is substantial, particularly with better thermal design allowing for sustained performance. This makes the iPad Pro a formidable competitor to current high-end tablets from other brands, many of which still use phone chips. ### Real-World Applications Using the new iPad Pro with the Magic Keyboard and Pro Pencil has made me rethink my tech setup. This iPad is powerful enough to handle tasks I typically reserve for my MacBook, such as video editing with Final Cut Pro, photo editing with Pixelmator, and managing my smart home setup. Mobile apps on the iPad often surpass their desktop counterparts in usability and design, particularly for tasks like photo and video editing, gaming, and even productivity apps like Google Docs. The iPad Pro’s OLED screen, touted by Apple as the best they've ever made, enhances the viewing experience with deep blacks and high brightness, perfect for HDR content. This screen is a dual-layer OLED, offering both contrast and brightness, making it ideal for watching movies or editing photos and videos. ### Potential Drawbacks There are a few concerns, though. Battery life is an unknown factor, especially with the new dual-layer OLED display. The storage options, while going up to 2 TB, might not suffice for someone like me who relies on an 8 TB MacBook. iPadOS, based on iOS, is simpler and might not offer the same file management capabilities as a full-fledged computer. Also, Apple doesn’t want the iPad to cannibalize MacBook sales, so there might be artificial limitations on the iPad’s capabilities. ### Conclusion Despite these concerns, the new iPad Pro feels like it could simplify and enhance my tech setup by replacing multiple devices. If it performs as well as it promises, this could be one of the most freeing tech decisions I’ve ever made. If you’re interested in seeing how this plays out, subscribe to my channel for updates. And yes, I realize my iPad puns are getting worse.

You've heard it seventy-five times, but turning it and turning it back on again is quite often the simplest solution that usually magically solve all means of technical errors. And this will be the very first thing any phone repair service will manage. Taking the battery out to make your handset to reset itself can be a great site. Just make sure that your handset actually has a removable battery before you pull it apart! Lend help - When it comes to a lost ball, the more eyes in need of it greater. The best approach is actually pay awareness to your group's shots, quality iphone cases you can obtain offer assistance when necessitated. The rule is that very first scratch . spend in excess of what 5 minutes searching samsung repair to acquire a ball before it is ruled reduced. However if you buy a rear-projection micro display, they usually have repairs more often than the flat-panel Lcd tvs. Bulb replacement seems turn out to be the most common repair. A bulb cost between $210 and $340. You will likely replace it on your individual. If you plan to get an extended warranty a good figure wireless would actually cover 15% in the cost with the HDTV or find the actual cost of your bulb and employ that as the maximum amount you would pay. Finally, remember the fact that if no one has any technical knowledge it's ok. Having a repair guide you will n't need any. They walk you through step by step and have pictures or quality iphone cases videos bundled as well .. But how do you know this particular repair is useful? The hardest thing about Wii DVD Drives are the troubleshooting. Bootcamp would recommend talking to an expert here or the author of the repair tips. Most people are not willing for you to tell you for nothing. But you can start out by saying "My console is doing. would your guide be able to fix this with this certain regarding drive. Response most likely will be yes. Wine beverages they offer a money lumbar region. Ask them up front if they feature any form of assistance to learn purchase if you do run into any samsung repair tool problems. The power section in certain areas of the LCD screen are still using the UC3842 pulse width modulation (pwm) ic. This type of ic is painless to get in repair samsung phone the market compare to your power ic which is very difficult to obtain. Samsung 153V LCD monitor is using the TOP247F power ic quite easy to troubleshoot if power fail in this model. Some power pack that were only available in only have minor burnt and after cleaning it and replaced the fuse, it will act as good as being the new a particular one. Also, when on the green, don't walk across another player's line of play. Impact doesn't matter if are usually wearing soft spikes or not, this a no no! By using the reverse phone search option, could possibly key in a phone number and subsequently out who called a person. Then, by typing the quantity in your computer, you will learn comprehensive details from the owner with the telephone group. You will means to use reverse phone lookups for many different the reason. For example, could quite possibly be getting text and make contact with calls from numbers you simply do not recognize are usually running up your bill. Also, if in order to concerned that the spouse always be cheating on you, a database is at your merchandise to discover details that you will tell you this.

For the past four years, my Samsung Galaxy Note 10 has been my trusted companion. Equipped with a dbrand grip case, it has endured numerous falls, with one unfortunate exception – a drop onto a granite threshold that shattered the curved screen, rendering it useless. This incident left me wondering if a foldable phone like the Samsung Z Flip 5 could be more durable, thanks to its dual-screen design. If the Z Flip 5 survives my rigorous durability test, it just might replace my current daily driver. The first challenge any folding phone faces is the inherent fragility that comes with its design. The Z Flip 5, like others in its category, includes a warning list that advises against pressing too hard on the screen, folding it with objects inside, and exposing it to sand. These warnings suggest a degree of vulnerability, but I am determined to test its limits.  Comparing the Z Flip 5 to the Motorola Razr Plus, the similarities in form factor are striking. The Flip 5 is marginally shorter, with similar thickness and width. While both phones boast attractive designs, the real test lies in their ability to withstand everyday use. Starting with the front screen, the Z Flip 5 features Gorilla glass covering Victus 2, which offers decent scratch resistance. Scratches appear at level 6 on the Mohs hardness scale, with deeper grooves at level 7. This is a promising start, indicating that the front screen can handle the rigors of daily pocket life. However, the inner screen is another story. True to the historical performance of flexible displays, it scratches at a mere level 2, with deeper grooves forming at level 3. Even fingernails can leave marks on this $1,000 smartphone. Despite a pre-installed screen protector, the underlying plastic is vulnerable. Fortunately, Samsung offers a one-time free screen protector replacement, although this must be done at their repair facilities. The outer frame, made of armor aluminum, also reveals its susceptibility to scratches. The power button, doubling as a fingerprint scanner, is well-placed but susceptible to damage. The lack of expandable storage is a significant downside for a long-term user like me. This seems like a deliberate move by Samsung to encourage more frequent upgrades, which I am not a fan of. The phone’s bottom hosts a microphone, a 25-watt USB-C charging port, and a lower stereo speaker. The back panel, also made of Gorilla Glass Victus, adds to the phone's durability. The hinge, a critical component, is made of aluminum and allows the phone to fold completely flat. For the rear cameras, Samsung uses glass protection for both the 12-megapixel ultra-wide and the standard 12-megapixel camera. These lenses are robust, complemented by a single-tone LED flash. To test the hinge’s resilience, I subjected the Flip 5 to a dirt test. Despite Samsung’s warning to avoid dust, the phone handled the gritty challenge reasonably well. The hinge showed some increased resistance and noise but remained functional, proving that while it should avoid dirt, it doesn’t require a sterile environment. Moving on to the screen’s heat resistance, the inner AMOLED display lasted 15 seconds before showing signs of damage, while the front display lasted about 10 seconds under a flame before pixels started to go black. The fingerprint scanner initially performed well but became non-functional after additional scratches. This is a minor setback, but not a deal-breaker. The ultimate test, however, was the bend test. Unlike its predecessor, the Flip 5’s redesigned hinge and glass rear panels withstood the pressure without bending or breaking, avoiding the catastrophic failures seen in other folding phones like the Pixel Fold. Despite the loss of the SD card slot, the Flip 5’s resilience in my tests, coupled with its sophisticated design and functional durability, make it a strong contender for my next phone. The presence of battery pull tabs, similar to those in the Fold 5, adds to its appeal for long-term use. To ensure the Flip 5 remains protected, dbrand offers a pre-production grip case that safeguards the outer screen and maintains the sleek design. For those interested in the teardown look, dbrand's skins are available for over 100 devices, including the Flip 5. In conclusion, the Samsung Z Flip 5 passes the durability test with flying colors. Its ability to withstand scratches, dirt, and bending, along with the protective gear available, makes it a viable option for those looking for a durable and stylish folding phone. If you're in the market for a new daily driver, the Z Flip 5 is worth considering.

Samsung works hard, but fake phone companies work harder. This is the tale of a brand new fake S24 Ultra, a one-to-one copy that aims to mimic Samsung’s latest flagship device. In the past, these counterfeit phones have often surprised me with their quality and detail. In this video, we delve into a detailed side-by-side unboxing and comparison between the real S24 Ultra and its fake counterpart, exploring just how far the makers of the fake device went in replicating Samsung's new AI features. #### Unboxing: Real vs. Fake Before even opening the boxes, a noticeable difference is evident: the fake phone box has a slightly grayer hue compared to the deep black of the real one. The text on the fake box is bolder and brighter, and while the real box lists IMEI 1 and IMEI 2, the fake one merely shows "II." Interestingly, the IMEI numbers on the fake box do correspond to a real Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, making it harder to distinguish based on this detail alone. Turning the boxes over, further discrepancies emerge. The fake box has some text along the seal that reads, "Do not accept if seal is broken," a detail absent from the real box. Additionally, the fake box features some amusing spelling mistakes, a hallmark of counterfeit products. One interesting test is weighing the boxes. Surprisingly, both the real and fake boxes weigh almost the same, indicating the counterfeiters put significant effort into replicating the real product's feel. #### Inside the Boxes Upon unboxing, the differences become clearer. The real S24 Ultra uses paper for its protective layers, which can be easily ripped, while the fake uses plastic. Both phones look strikingly similar at first glance, but a closer inspection reveals a bubble on the back glass of the fake phone, indicating it hasn’t been properly adhered and is slightly lifting. Examining the contents of the boxes, the fake phone includes a USB-A to USB-C cable, whereas the real one comes with a USB-C to USB-C cable. The SIM ejector pins are slightly different, but this is a minor and hard-to-detect difference. The start guides also differ, but these can vary by region, making them unreliable for authentication. #### The Phones: Side-by-Side Turning on both phones reveals that the fake one uses an LCD screen, while the real S24 Ultra boasts one of the best displays on the market. The bezels on the fake phone are surprisingly similar to the real one, except for the larger bottom chin. The fake phone even copies the boot screen almost exactly, but there are subtle differences. Upon navigating to the settings, the fake phone claims to run Android 14, but clicking a few times reveals it’s actually running Android 7 (Nougat). The real S24 Ultra, of course, displays the proper Android 14 interface. Interestingly, the fake phone offers software updates, albeit very small ones. This is odd, considering it's a device designed to scam people, yet it still receives updates past its initial sale. #### Camera and AI Features One of the main selling points of the S24 Ultra is its AI features, particularly in the camera. The fake phone’s camera setup appears convincing at first glance. However, by applying pressure with a spudger, it's evident that most of the lenses are fake, made of plastic, with only the main lens being glass. Testing the cameras and microphones reveals the stark contrast between the two devices. The real S24 Ultra produces clear, high-quality images and sound, while the fake phone's performance is notably poor. Furthermore, the fake phone lacks Samsung’s new AI features. For example, Samsung’s real S24 Ultra can use Google Lens for image search, but the fake one cannot replicate this feature. #### Internal Inspection Opening up the fake S24 Ultra reveals its true nature. The camera lenses are merely decorative, attached to a plastic bracket. The internal components, including the CPU and GPU, are far inferior to the real device. The fake phone uses a MediaTek 6580 CPU and Mali-400 MP GPU, both significantly outdated compared to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 found in the real S24 Ultra. The internal layout of the fake phone is also poorly designed. The main board is held down by screws that put pressure on it, a major design flaw. The battery is a 4500mAh unit, and the sub-board includes the SIM slot and charging port, labeled “SUB” (not to be confused with a plea to subscribe to a YouTube channel). #### Conclusion While the fake S24 Ultra is impressive in its attempt to mimic the real device, it falls short in critical areas such as build quality, screen performance, and 4g iphone internal components. The lack of genuine AI features and poor camera performance further highlight its deficiencies. This comparison serves as a cautionary tale: always verify the authenticity of a smartphone before purchasing, especially if the deal seems too good to be true. Counterfeit phones might look convincing, but their performance and reliability are nowhere near the level of genuine devices. Use this guide as a reference to avoid getting scammed and ensure you're investing in a legitimate, high-quality product.

In the high-stakes world of flagship smartphones, customer service can make or break a brand’s reputation. I decided to put Apple and Samsung to the test by intentionally damaging their most expensive devices: the iphone repair sydney 14 Pro Max and the Galaxy S23. Both phones were subjected to the same amount of force, causing significant damage. This allowed me to compare their repair processes, costs, and overall customer service experiences. #### The Apple Experience Starting with Apple, I called their support line and was promptly connected with a representative. Despite the long silences during the call, the representative was thorough, ensuring I had backed up my data and secured my accounts. He explained my repair options, including sending the phone in for repair. The estimated cost for a screen replacement was a staggering £474.24, nearly half the price of the phone itself. After agreeing to the repair and making the payment, iphone repair sydney Apple shipped a box to me within two business days for sending the phone back. The repair process was impressively swift. Apple kept me updated via text messages at every stage, from receiving my device to completing the repair. In just five days, my iPhone was back in my hands, looking and functioning like new. Despite the high cost, the speed and efficiency of Apple’s service were commendable. The experience highlighted Apple’s streamlined and well-structured repair system, albeit at a premium price. #### The Samsung Experience Samsung’s process began with a phone call that was less smooth. The representative struggled to hear me, and there was a lot of heavy breathing on the line. However, she managed to book a collection for the next day. Samsung’s service promised to send the device to a repair center for an assessment before providing a quote. This initial call lasted only 12 minutes, much quicker than Apple’s 30-minute call. The next day, Samsung collected the phone, and the waiting game began. Unfortunately, this is where Samsung’s service started to falter. Five days passed without any updates, prompting me to call their support again. After several holds and transfers, it became clear that Samsung had mismanaged my repair, failing to communicate effectively or track my device properly. Despite the promise of a swift repair, the process dragged on, filled with errors and confusion. After nearly a month, I finally received a text message from Samsung stating that my phone would be delivered that day. However, upon unboxing it, I discovered it was still broken. The entire process had to be restarted. Ultimately, Samsung quoted £223 for the repair, less than half of Apple’s price, but the lack of communication and delays were frustrating. #### The Verdict In the end, both companies had their strengths and weaknesses. Apple’s service was more expensive but highly efficient and transparent. Samsung’s service was more affordable but plagued with communication issues and delays. The entire ordeal with Samsung took 29 days, a far cry from Apple’s five-day turnaround. This experiment underscored the importance of robust customer service in the tech industry. While Apple’s high prices might deter some customers, the assurance of a quick and smooth repair process can justify the cost. On the other hand, Samsung’s affordability is appealing, but the extended wait times and poor communication can lead to significant frustration. Ultimately, neither experience was perfect, but Apple’s efficient service process left a more positive impression. This experience suggests that sometimes, paying a premium for faster and more reliable service might be worth it, especially when dealing with essential devices like smartphones

Hi guys, welcome back to another Hugh Jeffreys video. Today, we’re tackling a well-abused iPad Pro sent in by a viewer. The back is covered in deep scratches and dents, making it look like it was dragged across concrete. The front display is shattered, barely holding on, and the home button has fallen inside, rendering it non-functional. #### Background The viewer, Happy Phone from Gemana, Australia, bought the iPad for fifty dollars. It had a screen that was beyond shattered. After replacing the display, they only used it for a week before dropping it on concrete, resulting in the damage we see here. This is a first-generation iPad Pro with 32GB of storage, running iOS 13.0 beta. While the iPad still somewhat functions, the fingerprint reader is disabled, and the touch input doesn’t work in all areas. #### Initial Inspection Taking a closer look, the home button’s bracket is loose, and there seems to be a piece of paper jammed inside. As this iPad was donated, I decided to go all out and replace all the damaged parts to make it look new again. Thanks to iFixit for sponsoring this video and supplying a new display. You can get parts, tools, and guides at iFixit.com/Jeffreys. #### Disassembly Getting inside the iPad was easier than usual due to the poorly attached display, which I could just lift off. Inside, it was missing screws and had damage to the shields. The old adhesive wasn’t properly cleaned off, explaining why the display didn’t hold. Next, I removed the front display, taking out the two screws holding its bracket and disconnecting its flex cables. After removing any remaining glass around the perimeter, I unfastened all screws on the bracket over the logic board. There was also a missing screw here, requiring me to find replacements later. After disconnecting the battery, I tackled the speaker assembly, which was held in with incredibly strong adhesive and several cables. It required careful prying to avoid damage. Following this, I removed the headphone jack to clear the path for the speaker assembly. #### Logic Board and Battery Removing the logic board was challenging due to the adhesive holding it down. I unplugged all connecting cables, taking extra care around the soldered charging port and upper flex cable. The battery was similarly glued down, requiring a significant amount of alcohol to break down the adhesive. #### The Setback Everything was going according to plan until I encountered the smart connector port. Despite being held in with a bracket, it was glued in beyond anything I’d seen. No method I tried could dislodge it, glass covering and eventually, the cable broke off. This halted the project for 12 months until I could find a replacement. Many months later, I found one on iFixit, allowing the project to continue. #### Continuing the Restoration Proceeding with the restoration, I removed the remaining components from the old frame, including the speakers, antenna, and various buttons. The magnets used for Apple cases were especially tough to remove due to their strong adhesive and hard-to-reach placement. Reassembling began with installing the speaker grilles in each corner, followed by the antenna and volume buttons. I glued the microphone back into position before installing the power button and its flex cable, followed by the camera and LED flash. The next step was gluing all the magnets back into the new casing. To ensure correct alignment, I attached an Apple Smart Cover case before the glue dried. With the magnets in place, I installed the retaining brackets. #### Final Assembly The logic board was installed next, hoping the iPad would still function after over a year without power. I then fitted the new battery, connecting the smart connector and securing it with screws. The headphone jack, front-facing camera, and upper speakers were reinstalled, followed by the charging port and bottom speakers. After replacing the missing screws with those harvested from a donor iPad mini, I attached the adhesive for the new display panel. Salvaging the old home button, I installed it into the new display, ensuring it was secured against the glass covering to prevent it from falling inside the iPad again. #### Testing and Conclusion With the new display connected, it was time to test the iPad. It powered on, and everything appeared to be working. I cleaned the inside with a microfiber cloth and removed all protective films before pressing the display firmly into place. After letting the adhesive set for a few hours, I removed the final protective film, revealing a fully restored iPad Pro. This restoration was one of the most involved tech projects I’ve undertaken. The extraordinary amount of adhesive made it a nightmare to repair. Using a case to prevent scratches or hide them is much easier than attempting such a repair. Despite the difficulties, I’m happy with the result. Thanks to Happy Phone for sending in this iPad, and thanks to you for watching. If you liked what you saw, hit the subscribe button and check out the tablet playlist for more videos like this one. If you're looking for used devices, check out my website, link in the description. That’s all for this video, and I’ll catch you next time.